Ikeja Resorts & All Inclusive Resorts

Discover the 603 Best Resorts in Ikeja

About Ikeja Resorts on Online Reservations

Need a place to stay. Many resorts feature condos and apartment-style units available for booking. Ikeja has a variety of resorts nearby & a lot of options for travelers. Gain access to more than 603 resorts near Ikeja, as well as fun things you can do while there.

There are several resorts in the Ikeja area, several with gyms, wifi, spas, private pools & pet-friendly rooms. They can serve as a great option for different categories of travelers; be it a honeymoon resort for newly-married couples, a wedding resort for a destination wedding to be remembered, a golf resort for golf lovers, or resorts that are perfect for conferences and business meetings.

All inclusive Ikeja resorts may also be available for couples, families, or groups, and for both short & long-term travelers. Online Reservation large selection of resorts in or near Ikeja may provide a great alternative to staying in a vacation rental and help you find the right accommodation for your next trip.

Show more
Show less

Frequently Asked Questions About Ikeja Resorts

There are a lot of options in Ikeja. If you plan on staying in the Ikeja area, consider making a reservation for a few nights at one of these properties as these have been rated the top Resort Rentals in Ikeja:

Most of our listed resorts are suitable for families in Ikeja. Filter your all-inclusive resorts Ikeja with a family-friendly option to see which ones are right for you.
Yes, there are more than 603 resorts in Ikeja that have indoor and private swimming pools. Check out our filter option and find your best resort near Ikeja.
At Online Reservations, the rate for luxury resorts in Ikeja per night starts from $13. Our partner provides these prices & we calculated the average daily rate in Ikeja. Please see our partner's price for more details.
Most of the resorts are perfect for travelers, but based on guest reviews in 2026, the best resorts in or near Ikeja are: